Article IV: Scoring and Judging
Section 4.1: Scoring Protocol
- Judges must withhold all scoring until the completion of all rounds
- Each judge may award between zero (0) and six (6) points per round
- Audience participation: One (1) additional point available per round via viewer's choice
Section 4.2: Judging Criteria
Rounds shall be evaluated based on the following criteria:
1. Direct address of the topic
2. Clarity of position
3. Persuasiveness of argumentation
4. Presentation of specific evidence
5. Identification of opposing arguments' weaknesses
6. Effectiveness of counter-arguments and responses
Article V: Fact-Checking Procedures
Section 5.1: Request Protocol
- Fact checks may only be requested at the beginning of a rebuttal round
- Each side receives one minute and thirty seconds (1:30) to respond to fact checks
- Time used for fact-checking does not count against debate time
Section 5.2: Scoring Impact
- If information is proven incorrect: One (1) point deduction for the presenting party
- If information is proven correct: No penalty for the requesting party
Article VI: General Provisions
Section 6.1: Pre-Debate Meeting
A pre-debate meeting must be held to:
- Confirm round durations
- Review rules and procedures
- Address any questions or concerns
Section 6.2: Modifications
Any modifications to these rules must be:
- Agreed upon by all participating parties
- Documented in writing
- Approved by the Debate Moderator
Article VII: Code of Conduct
Section 7.1: Professional Conduct
All participants shall:
- Maintain professional decorum
- Show respect to opponents and staff
- Adhere to time limitations
- Accept judicial decisions as final
---
These rules and regulations are binding for all official Duel of Concepts debates. Violation may result in point deduction or disqualification at the discretion of the Debate Moderator.